2011 Minnesota Law Review Symposium

Citizens United: Democracy Realized—or Defeated?

Friday, October 21, 2011

Leading academics, political scientists, and practicing attorneys from across the country gathered at the Law School on Oct. 21, 2011 to discuss the Supreme Court’s landmark campaign-finance decision, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.


This activity was approved by the State Bar of Minnesota for 5.5 hours of standard CLE credits.


2011 Panelists

James Bopp, Jr.

Bopp, Coleson, & Bostrom

Richard Briffault

Columbia Law School

Guy-Uriel Charles

Duke University School of Law

Kenneth Goldstein

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Cleta Mitchell

Foley and Lardner

Spencer Overton

The George Washington University Law School

Mike Wittenwyler

Godfrey & Kahn

Video Recordings

Video recordings of these dynamic panels are now available for viewers to access:


Panel 1 – Citizens United: Right or Wrong? (part 1) (part 2)


Panel 2 – Don’t Look Now! Citizens United: An Empirical Analysis


Panel 3 – After Citizens United is Campaign Finance Reform a Phoenix—or the Titanic?


Forthcoming Articles in Volume 96, Issue 5

Super PACs, by Richard Briffault


Lessons Learned: Political Advertising and Political Law, by Kenneth Goldstein, David A. Schweidel, and Mike B. Wittenwyler


Donor Disclosure: Undermining the First Amendment, by Cleta Mitchell


Matching Political Contributions, by Spencer Overton



Please contact Margaret Wade, Symposium Articles Editor, with any questions or concerns.


Email: wadex100@umn.edu


Phone: 612-625-9330


Fax: 612-624-5400

Posted in News & Events, Symposia |

De Novo

  • Case Comment: Bhogaita v. Altamonte

    EVERY DOG CAN HAVE HIS DAY IN COURT: THE USE OF ANIMALS AS DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS Kyle R. Kroll, Volume 100, Online Managing Editor In Bhogaita v. Altamonte, the Eleventh Circuit recently decided whether to allow a dog in the courtroom as a demonstrative exhibit.[1] Although the case presented many serious [...]

  • Revisiting Water Bankruptcy

    REVISITING WATER BANKRUPTCY IN CALIFORNIA’S FOURTH YEAR OF DROUGHT Olivia Moe, Volume 100, Managing Editor This spring, as “extreme” to “exceptional” drought stretched across most of California—indicating that a four-year streak of drought was not about to resolve itself[1]—Governor Jerry Brown issued an unprecedented order to reduce potable urban water [...]

  • Defying Auer Deference

    DEFYING AUER DEFERENCE: SKIDMORE AS A SOLUTION TO CONSERVATIVE CONCERNS IN PEREZ v. MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION Nicholas R. Bednar, Volume 100, Lead Articles Editor* On March 9, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association.[1] The Court overturned the D.C. [...]