2011 Minnesota Law Review Symposium

Citizens United: Democracy Realized—or Defeated?

Friday, October 21, 2011

Leading academics, political scientists, and practicing attorneys from across the country gathered at the Law School on Oct. 21, 2011 to discuss the Supreme Court’s landmark campaign-finance decision, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.

 

This activity was approved by the State Bar of Minnesota for 5.5 hours of standard CLE credits.

 

2011 Panelists

James Bopp, Jr.

Bopp, Coleson, & Bostrom


Richard Briffault

Columbia Law School


Guy-Uriel Charles

Duke University School of Law


Kenneth Goldstein

University of Wisconsin-Madison


Cleta Mitchell

Foley and Lardner


Spencer Overton

The George Washington University Law School


Mike Wittenwyler

Godfrey & Kahn


Video Recordings


Video recordings of these dynamic panels are now available for viewers to access:

 

Panel 1 – Citizens United: Right or Wrong? (part 1) (part 2)

 

Panel 2 – Don’t Look Now! Citizens United: An Empirical Analysis

 

Panel 3 – After Citizens United is Campaign Finance Reform a Phoenix—or the Titanic?

 

Forthcoming Articles in Volume 96, Issue 5


Super PACs, by Richard Briffault

 

Lessons Learned: Political Advertising and Political Law, by Kenneth Goldstein, David A. Schweidel, and Mike B. Wittenwyler

 

Donor Disclosure: Undermining the First Amendment, by Cleta Mitchell

 

Matching Political Contributions, by Spencer Overton

 

Questions?


Please contact Margaret Wade, Symposium Articles Editor, with any questions or concerns.

 

Email: wadex100@umn.edu

 

Phone: 612-625-9330

 

Fax: 612-624-5400

Posted in News & Events, Symposia |

De Novo

  • Dan’s Flaw

    DAN’S [F]LAW: STATUTORY FAILURE TO ENFORCE ETHICAL BEHAVIOR IN CLINICAL DRUG TRIALS Noah Lewellen* I. INTRODUCTION Paul, a sophomore at the University of Minnesota, bursts into a lecture hall, loudly claims to see monsters sitting in the seats, and offers his services in slaying them. The police are called, and Paul is restrained and delivered […]

  • Case Comment: Bhogaita v. Altamonte

    EVERY DOG CAN HAVE HIS DAY IN COURT: THE USE OF ANIMALS AS DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS Kyle R. Kroll, Volume 100, Online Managing Editor In Bhogaita v. Altamonte, the Eleventh Circuit recently decided whether to allow a dog in the courtroom as a demonstrative exhibit.[1] Although the case presented many serious issues regarding the Fair Housing […]

  • Revisiting Water Bankruptcy

    REVISITING WATER BANKRUPTCY IN CALIFORNIA’S FOURTH YEAR OF DROUGHT Olivia Moe, Volume 100, Managing Editor This spring, as “extreme” to “exceptional” drought stretched across most of California—indicating that a four-year streak of drought was not about to resolve itself[1]—Governor Jerry Brown issued an unprecedented order to reduce potable urban water usage by twenty-five percent.[2] In […]