Volume 93 - No. 4 Minnesota Law Review

Note, Accepting Justice Kennedy’s Challenge: Reviving Race-Conscious School Assignments in the Wake of Parents Involved

More than half a century after Brown v. Board of Education mandated an end to racial segregation in American schools, districts nationwide remain crippled by racially homogenous classrooms and a widening achievement gap between white and minority students. Racial segregation is rising, minority student achievement is falling, and race-neutral solutions alone consistently fail to stem the tide. Against this backdrop, the Supreme Court overturned race-conscious school assignment programs that aimed to integrate the Seattle and Louisville school systems. The plurality opinion in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle Public School District No. 1 commanded districts to stop classifying students based on race. Providing the crucial fifth vote, however, Justice Kennedy limited the Court’s holding by finding a compelling educational interest in racial diversity.

Parents Involved altered the path to Brown’s promise of desegregation, but Justice Kennedy’s opinion ensured that we are not at a dead end. Taking account of Justice Kennedy’s well-defined concerns, this Note urges school districts to adopt assignment policies that broaden the concept of diversity, avoid racial quotas, and mandate informed reviews of the progress towards educational equality. In addition, in an effort to create a comprehensive plan that has the greatest likelihood of lasting integration, this Note suggests that school districts should include race-neutral alternatives that improve diversity.

:: View PDF

De Novo

  • Dan’s Flaw

    DAN’S [F]LAW: STATUTORY FAILURE TO ENFORCE ETHICAL BEHAVIOR IN CLINICAL DRUG TRIALS Noah Lewellen* I. INTRODUCTION Paul, a sophomore at the University of Minnesota, bursts into a lecture hall, loudly claims to see monsters sitting in the seats, and offers his services in slaying them. The police are called, and Paul is restrained and delivered […]

  • Case Comment: Bhogaita v. Altamonte

    EVERY DOG CAN HAVE HIS DAY IN COURT: THE USE OF ANIMALS AS DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS Kyle R. Kroll, Volume 100, Online Managing Editor In Bhogaita v. Altamonte, the Eleventh Circuit recently decided whether to allow a dog in the courtroom as a demonstrative exhibit.[1] Although the case presented many serious issues regarding the Fair Housing […]

  • Revisiting Water Bankruptcy

    REVISITING WATER BANKRUPTCY IN CALIFORNIA’S FOURTH YEAR OF DROUGHT Olivia Moe, Volume 100, Managing Editor This spring, as “extreme” to “exceptional” drought stretched across most of California—indicating that a four-year streak of drought was not about to resolve itself[1]—Governor Jerry Brown issued an unprecedented order to reduce potable urban water usage by twenty-five percent.[2] In […]