Minnesota Law Review

Death and Taxes: The Crushing Tax Burden After a Student Loan Is Discharged Due to Death of a Student

The country is currently facing a student loan crisis, with the amount of outstanding student loan debt exceeding the amount of credit card and auto loan debt. Students, often uninformed of the intricacies in their lending options, may have the option to choose federal or private student loans. Unbeknownst to many borrowers, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) treats private and federal student loan borrowers very differently. Under the current tax code, if a federal student loan borrower dies with outstanding student loan debt, his loans are dis-charged and his family is not assigned a tax burden. By contrast, if a private student loan borrower dies with outstanding student loan debt, his loans may be discharged, but his family is assigned a tax burden on the amount of the discharged debt. The result is families with thousands of dollars of taxable income they did not actually realize, forcing many of them into bankruptcy with large amounts of federal tax debt.

This Note argues that the current state of the tax code is inconsistent with other discharge of indebtedness exceptions, particularly bankruptcy, foreclosure, and federal student loans. This Note further argues that the current state of the tax code is inconsistent with tax theories, particularly the “ability to pay” and the “benefit received” theories as well as public policy. Lastly, this Note argues that Congress should create an exception for discharged debt due to student death, and proposes sufficient statutory language drawing on the language of other Title 26 provisions.

:: View PDF

News & Events

  • Fall Submissions Open – Headnotes

    The Minnesota Law Review: Headnotes fall submissions period is open. For more information, please visit our submissions page. Share this: on Twitter on Facebook on Google+

  • Vol. 97 Piece Quoted in Mother Jones Article

    A recent Mother Jones article predicting how the Roberts Court would resolve King v. Burwell draws on How Business Fares in the Supreme Court from Volume 97. You can read the article here. Share this: on Twitter on Facebook on Google+

  • Welcome to De Novo

    For nearly one hundred years, the Minnesota Law Review has been a leader amongst academic legal publications. When Professor Henry J. Fletcher launched the journal in 1917, his goal was simple. It was to “contribute a little something to the systematic growth of the whole law.” Since then, the Law [...]

  • Minnesota Law Review Alum Remembered 45 Years After Death

    Minnesota Law Review alumnus Tom Cranna was honored at the Annual Banquet this Spring, 45 years after his death. Mr. Cranna was remembered for his contributions to the journal, the school, and the positive impact he had on his family and friends. The Devil’s Lake Journal published a memorial which [...]

  • Follow MLR on Twitter!

    The Minnesota Law Review is proud to announce that we are now on Twitter. Follow us @MinnesotaLawRev for information and updates concerning the petition period and deadlines, the opening and closing of article submissions, our 2014 Symposium: Offenders in the Community, and all other news concerning our authors and publications. [...]

Newsletter

cforms contact form by delicious:days