Minnesota Law Review

Note, No Free Parking: Obtaining Relief from Trademark-Infringing Domain Name Parking

Trademarks are indispensable tools for businesses and consumers. Although the Internet serves as an efficient means for distributing trademark-related information, it nevertheless provides a platform that can reduce the value of trademarks. In particular, commercial domain name parking—the practice of registering domain names and setting up placeholder websites filled with advertisers’ hyperlinks—often impermissibly exploits trademarks, resulting in trademark infringement and consumer confusion. This Note advocates taking action, on behalf of both trademark owners and consumers, against those who commit this Internet-based harm. This Note first presents the purposes underlying trademark law and develops the concept of domain name parking. It then discusses the statutory framework available to contest trademark infringement. This Note suggests that the current federal statutory framework may adequately address individual trademark owners’ complaints of infringement via domain name parking. However, current law fails to provide a comprehensive remedy against the activity as a whole and does not sufficiently protect consumers from the consequences of trademark misuse. Finally, this Note proposes that the Federal Trade Commission investigate this activity and initiate suits against entities involved in domain name parking schemes.

:: View PDF

News & Events

  • Follow MLR on Twitter!

    The Minnesota Law Review is proud to announce that we are now on Twitter. Follow us @MinnesotaLawRev for information and updates concerning the petition period and deadlines, the opening and closing of article submissions, our 2014 Symposium: Offenders in the Community, and all other news concerning our authors and publications. [...]

  • Vol. 97 Lead Piece Cited in Al Jazeera Opinion Piece

    A recent Al Jazeera opinion piece that criticizes the Supreme Court’s Daimler decision cites to Volume 97′s lead piece, How Business Fares in the Supreme Court. You can read the Al Jazeera piece here.

  • Masthead for Volume 99 Board

    The masthead for the Board of Volume 99 of the Minnesota Law Review is now available. You can view the masthead here.

  • Above the Law Post Highlights MLR‘s Jump in Journal Rankings

    A recent post on Above the Law highlights the fact that the Minnesota Law Review was ranked 11th in the most recent 2013 edition of the Washington & Lee Law Review Rankings. You can read the post here.

  • Vol. 97 Lead Piece Cited on Slate

    A recent Slate article on the Supreme Court’s decision not to hear the “Moldy Washing Machine” cases, or overturn class certification of those cases in some circuits, cites to the Volume 97 Lead Piece, How Business Fares in the Supreme Court. You can read the article here.

Newsletter

cforms contact form by delicious:days