Minnesota Law Review

Legislating Corporate Social Responsibility: Expanding Social Disclosure Through the Resource Extraction Disclosure Rule

The United States has led a growing international effort to increase corporate transparency in the commercial development of natural resources. In 2010, Congress enacted the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Section 1504 of this Act requires resource extraction companies to publically disclose, through the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), all payments made to foreign governments—including taxes, fees, and royalties—among other payments commonly recognized as part of the revenue stream for commercial development of oil, gas, or minerals. The Act’s sponsors, Senators Cardin and Lugar, stated that the purpose of the legislation was to promote better governance in corrupt resource-rich countries. The mandated disclosure rules are intended to unveil the disparity between the extraction revenues received by a government and that government’s expenditures on societal needs. In August 2012, the SEC promulgated its final rule, which has since been mirrored in the European Union. In October 2012, industry groups challenged the rule in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, claiming the SEC had “grossly misinterpreted its statutory mandate,” forcing companies to publicly disclose more than Congress required and failing to properly assess the costs of compliance, including the burden on competition and benefits to shareholders and citizens of resource-rich countries. The court vacated the rule and remanded for further proceedings after determining that the SEC had erroneously followed the plain language of the statute when it had authority to exercise discretion.
Corporate transparency is critical to protect and promote human rights, and section 1504 is just one of several new efforts to mandate disclosure. This Note takes a closer look at section 1504—including its origin and place among international transparency initiatives—and the SEC’s rulemaking authority, to provide a model for future legislation and rulemaking aimed at expanding social disclosure.

:: View PDF

News & Events

  • Minnesota Law Review Alum Remembered 45 Years After Death

    Minnesota Law Review alumnus Tom Cranna was honored at the Annual Banquet this Spring, 45 years after his death. Mr. Cranna was remembered for his contributions to the journal, the school, and the positive impact he had on his family and friends. The Devil’s Lake Journal published a memorial which [...]

  • Follow MLR on Twitter!

    The Minnesota Law Review is proud to announce that we are now on Twitter. Follow us @MinnesotaLawRev for information and updates concerning the petition period and deadlines, the opening and closing of article submissions, our 2014 Symposium: Offenders in the Community, and all other news concerning our authors and publications. [...]

  • Vol. 97 Lead Piece Cited in Al Jazeera Opinion Piece

    A recent Al Jazeera opinion piece that criticizes the Supreme Court’s Daimler decision cites to Volume 97′s lead piece, How Business Fares in the Supreme Court. You can read the Al Jazeera piece here. Share this: on Twitter on Facebook on Google+

  • Masthead for Volume 99 Board

    The masthead for the Board of Volume 99 of the Minnesota Law Review is now available. You can view the masthead here. Share this: on Twitter on Facebook on Google+

  • Above the Law Post Highlights MLR‘s Jump in Journal Rankings

    A recent post on Above the Law highlights the fact that the Minnesota Law Review was ranked 11th in the most recent 2013 edition of the Washington & Lee Law Review Rankings. You can read the post here. Share this: on Twitter on Facebook on Google+

Newsletter

cforms contact form by delicious:days