Minnesota Law Review

Note, Kiss, Kiss, Bang, Bang: How Current Approaches to Guns and Domestic Violence Fail to Save Women’s Lives

In comparison to the general population, battered women are much more likely to experience gun violence at the hands of their intimate partners. However, despite an increasing recognition that the government must take special measures to stop gun violence against battered women, current laws remain ineffective at disarming batterers. Many state governments impose no disarmament requirements on batterers. In states that have adopted measures to disarm batterers, the laws suffer from disparate application and insufficient bureaucratic and physical infrastructures.

In response to the inadequate state laws, Congress enacted the Violence Against Women Act of 1996, which bans persons convicted of a domestic violence misdemeanor or subject to an order for protection from possessing guns. This Act relies entirely on state authorities to disarm batterers. However, the states’ reticence and inability to disarm batterers causes the federal gun laws to be underused and unable to protect women.

To better deter the gun violence that costs battered women’s lives, this Note recommends a new method of ensuring that states enforce the federal gun bans. This Note suggests that Congress should use its spending power to entice state governments to adopt and enforce federal gun bans as a minimum requirement for disarming batterers. In addition, this Note argues that the federal government should provide funds through the Violence Against Women Act for the formation of locally operated gun units. Congress would equip these units with the law enforcement capacity necessary to disarm batterers. The gun units would also operate gun repositories where officials could safely store guns. Lastly, this Note advocates that state reporting requirements would enable Congress to distribute federal funds to areas most affected by domestic violence. By providing incentives for the states to adopt and enforce federal gun laws, the federal government may better ensure women’s safety.

:: View PDF

News & Events

  • Fall Submissions Open – Headnotes

    The Minnesota Law Review: Headnotes fall submissions period is open. For more information, please visit our submissions page. Share this: on Twitter on Facebook on Google+

  • Vol. 97 Piece Quoted in Mother Jones Article

    A recent Mother Jones article predicting how the Roberts Court would resolve King v. Burwell draws on How Business Fares in the Supreme Court from Volume 97. You can read the article here. Share this: on Twitter on Facebook on Google+

  • Welcome to De Novo

    For nearly one hundred years, the Minnesota Law Review has been a leader amongst academic legal publications. When Professor Henry J. Fletcher launched the journal in 1917, his goal was simple. It was to “contribute a little something to the systematic growth of the whole law.” Since then, the Law [...]

  • Minnesota Law Review Alum Remembered 45 Years After Death

    Minnesota Law Review alumnus Tom Cranna was honored at the Annual Banquet this Spring, 45 years after his death. Mr. Cranna was remembered for his contributions to the journal, the school, and the positive impact he had on his family and friends. The Devil’s Lake Journal published a memorial which [...]

  • Follow MLR on Twitter!

    The Minnesota Law Review is proud to announce that we are now on Twitter. Follow us @MinnesotaLawRev for information and updates concerning the petition period and deadlines, the opening and closing of article submissions, our 2014 Symposium: Offenders in the Community, and all other news concerning our authors and publications. [...]


cforms contact form by delicious:days