Minnesota Law Review

Note, Protecting Communities from Unwarranted Environmental Risks: A NEPA Solution for ICCTA Preemption

In 1995, Congress passed the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act (ICCTA) in an effort to relieve the railroad industry of burdensome regulation. The ICCTA preempts local land-use regulations that communities formerly used to protect valuable resources such as drinking water supplies. Under some circumstances, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) provides the public with limited assurance that railroad projects will not unduly threaten the environment. However, because NEPA does not apply to all railroad projects, the ICCTA’s preemption provision continues to create a regulatory loophole through which railroad companies may undertake a variety of environmentally harmful activities without any local or federal government oversight. Theoretically courts could close the loophole by interpreting the ICCTA’s preemption provision narrowly. Yet no courts to date have taken this approach, and two courts of appeals have expressly rejected such an interpretation.

This Note urges Congress to close the regulatory loophole by enacting a statute closely resembling NEPA but requiring railroad companies, rather than federal government agencies, to perform an environmental impact assessment before undertaking activities likely to have a significant effect on the environment. Such a NEPA-like statute, if carefully crafted, would close the loophole directly, while minimizing the burdens imposed on railroad companies.

:: View PDF

De Novo

  • Case Comment: Bhogaita v. Altamonte

    EVERY DOG CAN HAVE HIS DAY IN COURT: THE USE OF ANIMALS AS DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS Kyle R. Kroll, Volume 100, Online Managing Editor In Bhogaita v. Altamonte, the Eleventh Circuit recently decided whether to allow a dog in the courtroom as a demonstrative exhibit.[1] Although the case presented many serious [...]

  • Revisiting Water Bankruptcy

    REVISITING WATER BANKRUPTCY IN CALIFORNIA’S FOURTH YEAR OF DROUGHT Olivia Moe, Volume 100, Managing Editor This spring, as “extreme” to “exceptional” drought stretched across most of California—indicating that a four-year streak of drought was not about to resolve itself[1]—Governor Jerry Brown issued an unprecedented order to reduce potable urban water [...]

  • Defying Auer Deference

    DEFYING AUER DEFERENCE: SKIDMORE AS A SOLUTION TO CONSERVATIVE CONCERNS IN PEREZ v. MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION Nicholas R. Bednar, Volume 100, Lead Articles Editor* On March 9, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association.[1] The Court overturned the D.C. [...]