Minnesota Law Review

Note, The Protective Scope of the Fair Debt Collection Practice Act: Providing Mortgagors the Protection They Deserve from Abusive Foreclosure Practices

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) is intended to provide consumers broad protection from abusive and harassing practices of debt collectors. However, courts disagree over whether mortgage foreclosure constitutes debt collection under the Act. Several circuit courts hold that mortgage foreclosure is debt collection under the FDCPA, but many district courts view foreclosure as an action distinct from the collection of money and therefore hold that foreclosure is outside the protective scope of the Act. Given the unprecedented rise in mortgage foreclosures over the past two years, it is imperative that courts begin to take a unified approach to interpretation of the FDCPA. This Note argues that courts should uniformly interpret the FDCPA as protective of mortgage foreclosure activities.

The plain language and legislative history of the FDCPA command a broad interpretation of the Act inclusive of home mortgage foreclosure. This interpretation furthers the Act’s broad goal of protecting all consumers from abusive debt collection practices and recognizes that mortgagors are within the class of individuals intended to be protected by the FDCPA. The proposed interpretation further recognizes that satisfaction of debt is a creditor’s true objective in foreclosure. An inclusive interpretation of § 1692f(6) is necessary to support the proposed interpretation of the FDCPA, but such an interpretation is supported by principles of statutory interpretation. The proposed interpretation looks beyond the means used to accomplish debt collection, and in doing so, provides mortgagors the protections they need and to which they are entitled.

:: View PDF

News & Events

  • Welcome

    For nearly one hundred years, the Minnesota Law Review has been a leader amongst academic legal publications. When Professor Henry J. Fletcher launched the journal in 1917, his goal was simple. It was to “contribute a little something to the systematic growth of the whole law.” Since then, the Law [...]

  • Minnesota Law Review Alum Remembered 45 Years After Death

    Minnesota Law Review alumnus Tom Cranna was honored at the Annual Banquet this Spring, 45 years after his death. Mr. Cranna was remembered for his contributions to the journal, the school, and the positive impact he had on his family and friends. The Devil’s Lake Journal published a memorial which [...]

  • Follow MLR on Twitter!

    The Minnesota Law Review is proud to announce that we are now on Twitter. Follow us @MinnesotaLawRev for information and updates concerning the petition period and deadlines, the opening and closing of article submissions, our 2014 Symposium: Offenders in the Community, and all other news concerning our authors and publications. [...]

  • Vol. 97 Lead Piece Cited in Al Jazeera Opinion Piece

    A recent Al Jazeera opinion piece that criticizes the Supreme Court’s Daimler decision cites to Volume 97′s lead piece, How Business Fares in the Supreme Court. You can read the Al Jazeera piece here. Share this: on Twitter on Facebook on Google+

  • Masthead for Volume 99 Board

    The masthead for the Board of Volume 99 of the Minnesota Law Review is now available. You can view the masthead here. Share this: on Twitter on Facebook on Google+


cforms contact form by delicious:days