Minnesota Law Review

Oh the Places Stockholders Will Go! A Guide for Navigating Forum Selection Bylaws Outside of Delaware

Until 2010, stockholders initiated intra-corporate, derivative suits by default in the state of incorporation. Vice Chancellor Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery suggested in dicta in In re Revlon that boards of directors and stockholders could include an exclusive forum selection clause in their charter provisions. One year later, in Galaviz v. Berg, a California federal court held that corporate boards of directors could not unilaterally adopt forum selection bylaws. Until this June, little guidance existed for stockholders-plaintiffs and director-defendants. On June 25, the Delaware Court of Chancery held in Boilermakers that forum selection bylaws are enforceable. However, the court limited its analysis. It did not reach the fact-laden question of fiduciary duties violations by the board. Going forward, it is unclear how non-Delaware courts will respond. The enforceability of forum selection bylaws will be decided on a state-by-state basis. Delaware law will apply via the internal affairs doctrine for Delaware corporations, but its application does not mean that forum selection bylaws will be universally upheld. No clear guidance exists for foreign courts encountering this issue of first impression, especially when suits involve potential fiduciary duties violations.

This Note proposes a framework for non-Delaware courts to aid them in determining the enforceability of forum selection bylaws. It focuses on fiduciary duties challenges under Delaware law, which the court in Boilermakers did not directly reach. The step-by-step guide mediates stockholders’ and directors’ respective fiduciary duties and multi-jurisdiction litigation concerns.

:: View PDF

News & Events

  • Fall Submissions Open – Headnotes

    The Minnesota Law Review: Headnotes fall submissions period is open. For more information, please visit our submissions page. Share this: on Twitter on Facebook on Google+

  • Vol. 97 Piece Quoted in Mother Jones Article

    A recent Mother Jones article predicting how the Roberts Court would resolve King v. Burwell draws on How Business Fares in the Supreme Court from Volume 97. You can read the article here. Share this: on Twitter on Facebook on Google+

  • Welcome to De Novo

    For nearly one hundred years, the Minnesota Law Review has been a leader amongst academic legal publications. When Professor Henry J. Fletcher launched the journal in 1917, his goal was simple. It was to “contribute a little something to the systematic growth of the whole law.” Since then, the Law [...]

  • Minnesota Law Review Alum Remembered 45 Years After Death

    Minnesota Law Review alumnus Tom Cranna was honored at the Annual Banquet this Spring, 45 years after his death. Mr. Cranna was remembered for his contributions to the journal, the school, and the positive impact he had on his family and friends. The Devil’s Lake Journal published a memorial which [...]

  • Follow MLR on Twitter!

    The Minnesota Law Review is proud to announce that we are now on Twitter. Follow us @MinnesotaLawRev for information and updates concerning the petition period and deadlines, the opening and closing of article submissions, our 2014 Symposium: Offenders in the Community, and all other news concerning our authors and publications. [...]


cforms contact form by delicious:days