Minnesota Law Review

The Problem of Authority: Revisiting the Service Conception

Why ought we subject our will to authority? How is a person with authority justified in demanding that we subject our will? What does it mean to be a legitimate authority? This is the problem of authority that Professor Raz addressed many years ago under the title of the service conception of authority. The service conception not only addressed these issues but also attempted to subsume under it all other problems of authority.

However, the account Professor Raz offered was not met without criticism. Critique ranged from total rejection of the theory to moderate tinkering of some of the theory’s precepts. The most common moderate criticism argues that legitimate authority, at any rate legitimate political authority, presupposes a special connection between rulers and those they rule, a special bond that is overlooked by the service conception.

In this Article, Professor Raz revisits his service conception of authority. After providing background methodological points and restating the service conception in brief, this Article elaborates the service conception and its implications. Next, Raz addresses the moderate critics’ argument that the service conception misses the special link between the government and the governed. Raz considers the possibility that such a link is forged by consent or perhaps is constituted by one’s identification with, or membership of, his or her community, political or otherwise.

:: View PDF

De Novo

  • Case Comment: Bhogaita v. Altamonte

    EVERY DOG CAN HAVE HIS DAY IN COURT: THE USE OF ANIMALS AS DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS Kyle R. Kroll, Volume 100, Online Managing Editor In Bhogaita v. Altamonte, the Eleventh Circuit recently decided whether to allow a dog in the courtroom as a demonstrative exhibit.[1] Although the case presented many serious [...]

  • Revisiting Water Bankruptcy

    REVISITING WATER BANKRUPTCY IN CALIFORNIA’S FOURTH YEAR OF DROUGHT Olivia Moe, Volume 100, Managing Editor This spring, as “extreme” to “exceptional” drought stretched across most of California—indicating that a four-year streak of drought was not about to resolve itself[1]—Governor Jerry Brown issued an unprecedented order to reduce potable urban water [...]

  • Defying Auer Deference

    DEFYING AUER DEFERENCE: SKIDMORE AS A SOLUTION TO CONSERVATIVE CONCERNS IN PEREZ v. MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION Nicholas R. Bednar, Volume 100, Lead Articles Editor* On March 9, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association.[1]F The Court overturned the D.C. [...]