Minnesota Law Review

What’s My Age Again? The Immigrant Age Problem in the Criminal Justice System

Each year, immigrants arrive in the United States without knowing their exact age. When they arrive, United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) provides each immigrant official documents that list personal information, including a birth date. When immigrants do not know their exact age, USCIS allows them to use an estimated birth date. As a result, these immigrants will hold official documents that list an exact date of birth, even though their date of birth is unknown. Although these estimated birth dates allow the government to administer benefits and track immigration flow, they lack certainty and accuracy.

The uncertainty and inaccuracy in the estimated birth dates of these immigrant children creates the immigrant age problem, which arises when these immigrants clash with a criminal justice system that demands age-specificity at three stages. First, a defendant’s age may determine which court – juvenile or adult – has jurisdiction. Second, a defendant’s or victim’s age might be an element of the crime, requiring the State to prove age beyond a reasonable doubt. Third, a defendant’s age may limit the maximum sentence a court may impose.

This Note examines the origins of the immigrant age problem and explains how immigrants with unknown birth dates can legally obtain official documents listing exact birth dates. It then analyzes the legal dilemmas that the immigrant age problem creates. Finally, it proposes a solution to the immigrant age problem at each of the three relevant stages of the criminal process.

:: View PDF

News & Events

  • Welcome

    For nearly one hundred years, the Minnesota Law Review has been a leader amongst academic legal publications. When Professor Henry J. Fletcher launched the journal in 1917, his goal was simple. It was to “contribute a little something to the systematic growth of the whole law.” Since then, the Law [...]

  • Minnesota Law Review Alum Remembered 45 Years After Death

    Minnesota Law Review alumnus Tom Cranna was honored at the Annual Banquet this Spring, 45 years after his death. Mr. Cranna was remembered for his contributions to the journal, the school, and the positive impact he had on his family and friends. The Devil’s Lake Journal published a memorial which [...]

  • Follow MLR on Twitter!

    The Minnesota Law Review is proud to announce that we are now on Twitter. Follow us @MinnesotaLawRev for information and updates concerning the petition period and deadlines, the opening and closing of article submissions, our 2014 Symposium: Offenders in the Community, and all other news concerning our authors and publications. [...]

  • Vol. 97 Lead Piece Cited in Al Jazeera Opinion Piece

    A recent Al Jazeera opinion piece that criticizes the Supreme Court’s Daimler decision cites to Volume 97′s lead piece, How Business Fares in the Supreme Court. You can read the Al Jazeera piece here. Share this: on Twitter on Facebook on Google+

  • Masthead for Volume 99 Board

    The masthead for the Board of Volume 99 of the Minnesota Law Review is now available. You can view the masthead here. Share this: on Twitter on Facebook on Google+


cforms contact form by delicious:days