Summer 2016: Volume 101 - Scalia Symposium


Minnesota Law Review is pleased to present a collection of essays on Justice Antonin Scalia’s impact on the Supreme Court. These essays aim to present a wide look at Justice Scalia’s many contributions to the Court during his decades on the Bench. While Justice Scalia was one of the most polarizing figures on the Court […]

Read More

Foreword: A Consequential Justice

When he visited the University of Minnesota in October 2015, Justice Scalia commented that Justice William Brennan was “the most influential Justice of the twentieth century.” Although their styles could not have been more different, Professor Robert A. Stein observes that both Justice Brennan and Justice Scalia will certainly be remembered as two of the […]

Read More :: View PDF

Remembering Justice Antonin Scalia

Justice Scalia’s presence on the bench nearly matches his overall doctrinal contributions. Professor Alan B. Morrison comments on Justice Scalia’s minimal record upon appointment to the Supreme Court, the challenges he presented to lawyers at oral argument, his aversion to legislative history, and his tendency towards writing colorful dissenting opinions and predicting doom and gloom […]

Read More :: View PDF

Playing Favorites? Justice Scalia, Abortion Protests, and Judicial Impartiality

By examining Justice Scalia’s First Amendment jurisprudence through the lens of abortion cases, Professor Daniel A. Farber comments on how judicial bias may have played a part in the Court’s decisions during this era.

Read More :: View PDF

Rescued from the Grave and Then Covered with Mud: Justice Scalia and the Unfinished Restoration of the Confrontation Right

In drafting the Supreme Court’s decision in Crawford v. Washington, Justice Scalia brought back to life the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause. In Justice Scalia’s absence, Professor Richard D. Friedman sees the future development of the doctrine to be far from certain.

Read More :: View PDF

Justice Scalia: Affirmative or Negative?

Justice Scalia’s experiences played a crucial role in shaping how Justice Scalia framed his arguments. Professor Stephen M. Griffin comments on the ways in which the Justice’s background may have influenced his constitutional theory and his writing style.

Read More :: View PDF

Justice Scalia’s Unparalleled Contributions to Administrative Law

Throughout his legal career, Justice Scalia displayed a great interest in and exercised great influence over the development of administrative law. Professor Richard J. Pierce, Jr. discusses the changes Justice Scalia helped to impart on the field during his decades on the Bench.

Read More :: View PDF

Justice Scalia’s Jiggery-Pokery in Federal Arbitration Law

In authoring three decisions on the Federal Arbitration Act in his final years on the Court, Justice Scalia played a crucial role in shaping this area of the law. Although Justice Scalia’s interest in the field may have only developed late in his career, Professor David S. Schwartz notes that it will not soon be […]

Read More :: View PDF

Justice Scalia’s Innocence Tetralogy

Justice Scalia’s record as it relates to the rights of criminal defendants is as varied as it is wide-ranging. Professor Lee Kovarsky examines the Justice Scalia’s impact on one of those doctrines: “actual innocence.”

Read More :: View PDF

Tie Votes and the 2016 Supreme Court Vacancy

Professor Justin R. Pidot previews his forthcoming piece in Minnesota Law Review, “Tie Votes in the Supreme Court” by summarizing his findings and commenting on how the Justices may approach potential tie votes in Justice Scalia’s absence.

Read More :: View PDF


Volume 100 - Issue 6

Not Found

No articles were found for this issue. Perhaps searching will help?

De Novo

  • Does Mother Nature Get a Vote?

    DOES MOTHER NATURE GET A VOTE? OUR NEXT PRESIDENT COULD IMPACT AMERICA’S INVOLVEMENT IN THE PARIS AGREEMENT ON CLIMATE CHANGE By: Taylor Mayhall, Volume 101 Staff Member Last December, representatives from 195 countries assembled in Paris to converse about a subject which they all felt was worthy of attention on […]

  • Dan’s Flaw

    DAN’S [F]LAW: STATUTORY FAILURE TO ENFORCE ETHICAL BEHAVIOR IN CLINICAL DRUG TRIALS Noah Lewellen* I. INTRODUCTION Paul, a sophomore at the University of Minnesota, bursts into a lecture hall, loudly claims to see monsters sitting in the seats, and offers his services in slaying them. The police are called, and […]

  • Case Comment: Bhogaita v. Altamonte

    EVERY DOG CAN HAVE HIS DAY IN COURT: THE USE OF ANIMALS AS DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS Kyle R. Kroll, Volume 100, Online Managing Editor In Bhogaita v. Altamonte, the Eleventh Circuit recently decided whether to allow a dog in the courtroom as a demonstrative exhibit.[1] Although the case presented many serious […]

© 2011-2016 Minnesota Law Review. All Rights Reserved.