Minnesota Law Review

Note, From House to Home: Creating a Right to Early Lease Termination for Domestic Violence Victims

Domestic violence remains one of society’s most pervasive and complicated problems. Among the complexities lies a victim’s difficult decision to leave an abuser. In an overwhelming majority of states, domestic violence victims also face the financial burden of terminating their residential leases when deciding to flee abuse. Such monetary hardships prevent victims from leaving their residence, despite the threat of future domestic violence. Victims’ other options include bearing the full cost, dodging payment and ruining their credit, or negotiating with landlords for reduced termination fees, a generally futile endeavor. While five state statutes currently allow victims to terminate a rental agreement without financial penalty, more states must act.

This Note proposes strategies by which states can construct a right to early termination for domestic violence victims. After examining existing laws, victim needs, and landlord concerns, the recommendations include amending landlord-tenant codes, articulating landlord rights and obligations, and collaborating with advocates, legislators, and landlords in the drafting process. This Note also argues that a statutory right to early termination benefits victims and landlords alike. By removing a financial barrier, domestic violence victims have greater opportunity to start anew while landlords enjoy a reduction in violence on their rental property.

:: View PDF

De Novo

  • Case Comment: Bhogaita v. Altamonte

    EVERY DOG CAN HAVE HIS DAY IN COURT: THE USE OF ANIMALS AS DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS Kyle R. Kroll, Volume 100, Online Managing Editor In Bhogaita v. Altamonte, the Eleventh Circuit recently decided whether to allow a dog in the courtroom as a demonstrative exhibit.[1] Although the case presented many serious [...]

  • Revisiting Water Bankruptcy

    REVISITING WATER BANKRUPTCY IN CALIFORNIA’S FOURTH YEAR OF DROUGHT Olivia Moe, Volume 100, Managing Editor This spring, as “extreme” to “exceptional” drought stretched across most of California—indicating that a four-year streak of drought was not about to resolve itself[1]—Governor Jerry Brown issued an unprecedented order to reduce potable urban water [...]

  • Defying Auer Deference

    DEFYING AUER DEFERENCE: SKIDMORE AS A SOLUTION TO CONSERVATIVE CONCERNS IN PEREZ v. MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION Nicholas R. Bednar, Volume 100, Lead Articles Editor* On March 9, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association.[1]F The Court overturned the D.C. [...]