Minnesota Law Review

Moving Past Preemption: Enhancing the Power of Local Governments over Hydraulic Fracturing

Technological improvements to a drilling technique known as hydraulic fracturing have opened up access to a century’s supply of natural gas across the United States. The cities and towns that sit above these vast deposits, however, are increasingly concerned about the transformative effect of the fracking industry on their communities. In the absence of federal regulations, state and local governments have the primary regulatory authority over fracking, but state governments have sought to preempt most or all of the traditional power of local governments over land use. This Note reviews the legal disputes that have arisen in Pennsylvania, New York and Colorado regarding the effect of state preemption on local control. In addition, it reviews the ineffective attempts of Colorado and the Delaware River Basin Commission to encourage cooperation between multiple levels of government in the regulatory process. This analysis ultimately shows that local governments are increasingly powerless to prevent or slow the spread of fracking in their communities.

This Note argues that local governments are in the best position to understand the unique effects of industrial activities like fracking on their communities, and that therefore their knowledge should be utilized in the creation of regulations. This Note proposes that states create new agencies with regulatory authority over fracking that bring together state and local representatives to create new regulations to govern fracking. These organizations would allow local government representatives to have an official and meaningful voice in the creation of regulations to help ensure the protection of the environment and character of local communities.

:: View PDF

De Novo

  • Case Comment: Bhogaita v. Altamonte

    EVERY DOG CAN HAVE HIS DAY IN COURT: THE USE OF ANIMALS AS DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS Kyle R. Kroll, Volume 100, Online Managing Editor In Bhogaita v. Altamonte, the Eleventh Circuit recently decided whether to allow a dog in the courtroom as a demonstrative exhibit.[1] Although the case presented many serious [...]

  • Revisiting Water Bankruptcy

    REVISITING WATER BANKRUPTCY IN CALIFORNIA’S FOURTH YEAR OF DROUGHT Olivia Moe, Volume 100, Managing Editor This spring, as “extreme” to “exceptional” drought stretched across most of California—indicating that a four-year streak of drought was not about to resolve itself[1]—Governor Jerry Brown issued an unprecedented order to reduce potable urban water [...]

  • Defying Auer Deference

    DEFYING AUER DEFERENCE: SKIDMORE AS A SOLUTION TO CONSERVATIVE CONCERNS IN PEREZ v. MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION Nicholas R. Bednar, Volume 100, Lead Articles Editor* On March 9, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association.[1] The Court overturned the D.C. [...]