Minnesota Law Review

Note, Blowing Up the Pipes: The Use of (c)(4) to Dismantle Campaign Finance Reform

In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United, nonprofit organizations originally designed to promote social welfare interests have become the latest loop­hole for political financiers to bypass campaign finance regulations. The federal regime of campaign finance laws—designed to prevent corruption and preserve the integrity of our democratic institutions—is being circumvented by wealthy interests. Donors use these nonprofits, organized under § 501(c)(4) of the tax code, to anonymously inject unlimited amounts of political money into the electoral process. The 2010 midterm election witnessed the largest amount of independent spending from interest groups in a nonpresidential election. Nearly $293 million came from outside interest groups, with at least $138 million from organizations with anonymous donors. These numbers are staggering, and without reform, the Note contends, the political influence of secretive money will only grow in future elections.

The Note examines the rise of § 501(c)(4) nonprofit organizations as a modern tool for bypassing campaign finance regulation and looks critically at case studies from the 2010 midterm elections. After assessing possible avenues for reform, the Note advocates for disclosure and disclaimer requirements as the best option for reforming § 501(c)(4) political activity. Disclosure and disclaimer requirements improve voter confidence in the electoral process, prevent corruption and/or the appearance of corruption, aid in the enforcement of contribution limits, and allow voters to completely evaluate candidates. Although legislation called the DISCLOSE Act failed in the last Congress, the Note argues that similar legislation is both politically feasible and constitutionally sound, and should be passed immediately before future elections further undermine our democratic institutions.

:: View PDF

News & Events

  • Fall Submissions Open – Headnotes

    The Minnesota Law Review: Headnotes fall submissions period is open. For more information, please visit our submissions page. Share this: on Twitter on Facebook on Google+

  • Vol. 97 Piece Quoted in Mother Jones Article

    A recent Mother Jones article predicting how the Roberts Court would resolve King v. Burwell draws on How Business Fares in the Supreme Court from Volume 97. You can read the article here. Share this: on Twitter on Facebook on Google+

  • Welcome to De Novo

    For nearly one hundred years, the Minnesota Law Review has been a leader amongst academic legal publications. When Professor Henry J. Fletcher launched the journal in 1917, his goal was simple. It was to “contribute a little something to the systematic growth of the whole law.” Since then, the Law [...]

  • Minnesota Law Review Alum Remembered 45 Years After Death

    Minnesota Law Review alumnus Tom Cranna was honored at the Annual Banquet this Spring, 45 years after his death. Mr. Cranna was remembered for his contributions to the journal, the school, and the positive impact he had on his family and friends. The Devil’s Lake Journal published a memorial which [...]

  • Follow MLR on Twitter!

    The Minnesota Law Review is proud to announce that we are now on Twitter. Follow us @MinnesotaLawRev for information and updates concerning the petition period and deadlines, the opening and closing of article submissions, our 2014 Symposium: Offenders in the Community, and all other news concerning our authors and publications. [...]


cforms contact form by delicious:days