Minnesota Law Review

Note, It Can Do More Than Protect Your Credit Score: Regulating Social Media

A growing number of employers are factoring job candidates’ social media profiles into their hiring decisions. Employers value social media pre-employment screening because it provides access to previously unobtainable applicant information. However, job candidates are wary of social media pre-employment screening due to concerns over the trustworthiness and authenticity of information obtained from the Internet. It should come as no surprise, then, that there is sharp disagreement over the legality of social media pre-employment screening. Early efforts to regulate social media pre-employment screening focused on Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Fourth Amendment. These efforts were largely unsatisfactory because they failed to ensure accuracy and relevancy during the social media pre-employment screening process.

Thanks in large part to the emergence of third parties that offer to conduct social media pre-employment screening for employers, a new regulatory solution responsive to applicants’ privacy interests is now available. The Note recommends that the Fair Credit Reporting Act should be amended to require all employers interested in using social media to evaluate job candidates to use third-party screening companies. By doing so, social media pre-employment screening will be subject to the fairness constraints of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, including its notice and consent requirements. Finally, the Note argues that the Federal Trade Commission and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission should be the primary parties responsible for monitoring employers’ social media pre-employment screening and its compliance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act.


:: View PDF

News & Events

  • Fall Submissions Open – Headnotes

    The Minnesota Law Review: Headnotes fall submissions period is open. For more information, please visit our submissions page. Share this: on Twitter on Facebook on Google+

  • Vol. 97 Piece Quoted in Mother Jones Article

    A recent Mother Jones article predicting how the Roberts Court would resolve King v. Burwell draws on How Business Fares in the Supreme Court from Volume 97. You can read the article here. Share this: on Twitter on Facebook on Google+

  • Welcome to De Novo

    For nearly one hundred years, the Minnesota Law Review has been a leader amongst academic legal publications. When Professor Henry J. Fletcher launched the journal in 1917, his goal was simple. It was to “contribute a little something to the systematic growth of the whole law.” Since then, the Law [...]

  • Minnesota Law Review Alum Remembered 45 Years After Death

    Minnesota Law Review alumnus Tom Cranna was honored at the Annual Banquet this Spring, 45 years after his death. Mr. Cranna was remembered for his contributions to the journal, the school, and the positive impact he had on his family and friends. The Devil’s Lake Journal published a memorial which [...]

  • Follow MLR on Twitter!

    The Minnesota Law Review is proud to announce that we are now on Twitter. Follow us @MinnesotaLawRev for information and updates concerning the petition period and deadlines, the opening and closing of article submissions, our 2014 Symposium: Offenders in the Community, and all other news concerning our authors and publications. [...]


cforms contact form by delicious:days