Minnesota Law Review

Note, The Problem with Waste: Delaware’s Lenient Treatment of Waste Claims at the Demand Stage of Derivative Litigation

The Note addresses the Delaware courts’ treatment of waste claims at the demand stage of derivative litigation. Recent Delaware opinions indicate that waste is part of the fiduciary duty of good faith. This means that directors are not protected from claims of waste by section 102(b)(7) exculpation clauses in their corporations’ certificates of incorporation. Additionally, the Delaware courts consistently describe waste as the most difficult claim of a violation of a director’s fiduciary duties for plaintiffs to succeed with at trial. Nonetheless, the courts do not universally require waste claims to contain particularized factual allegations at the demand stage. The Delaware courts’ placement of waste under good faith and their lenient approach to waste claims at the demand stage create an opening for plaintiffs. Plaintiffs can currently bypass the exculpation clause protection for directors and succeed in claiming demand futility if they bring a claim of waste, even if the claim contains only minimal factual support.

The Note argues that the Delaware courts should explicitly place waste under the duty of good faith, thereby making waste a nonexculpable claim. To preserve the viability of the demand stage of derivative litigation, the courts should also require particularized factual allegations for claims of waste when determining demand futility. This treatment will maintain the directors’ authority to manage their corporations, allow shareholders to hold directors accountable for irrational business decisions, and potentially alter the corporate culture that contrib­uted to the recent economic crisis.

:: View PDF

News & Events

  • Fall Submissions Open – Headnotes

    The Minnesota Law Review: Headnotes fall submissions period is open. For more information, please visit our submissions page. Share this: on Twitter on Facebook on Google+

  • Vol. 97 Piece Quoted in Mother Jones Article

    A recent Mother Jones article predicting how the Roberts Court would resolve King v. Burwell draws on How Business Fares in the Supreme Court from Volume 97. You can read the article here. Share this: on Twitter on Facebook on Google+

  • Welcome to De Novo

    For nearly one hundred years, the Minnesota Law Review has been a leader amongst academic legal publications. When Professor Henry J. Fletcher launched the journal in 1917, his goal was simple. It was to “contribute a little something to the systematic growth of the whole law.” Since then, the Law [...]

  • Minnesota Law Review Alum Remembered 45 Years After Death

    Minnesota Law Review alumnus Tom Cranna was honored at the Annual Banquet this Spring, 45 years after his death. Mr. Cranna was remembered for his contributions to the journal, the school, and the positive impact he had on his family and friends. The Devil’s Lake Journal published a memorial which [...]

  • Follow MLR on Twitter!

    The Minnesota Law Review is proud to announce that we are now on Twitter. Follow us @MinnesotaLawRev for information and updates concerning the petition period and deadlines, the opening and closing of article submissions, our 2014 Symposium: Offenders in the Community, and all other news concerning our authors and publications. [...]


cforms contact form by delicious:days