Minnesota Law Review

Status Update: Adapting the Stored Communications Act to a Modern World

This Note addresses the Stored Communications Act’s application to civil discovery. Congress passed the Stored Communications Act in 1986 to extend Fourth Amendment protection to electronic communications and remote computing. Congress never intended for the SCA to limit civil discovery of these communications, however, judges have expanded the SCA’s scope to limit civil discovery of electronic communications in many jurisdictions. As a result, many civil litigants are barred from filing third party subpoenas to obtain information from Internet service providers like Google, Facebook, and Twitter due to this judicial extrapolation of the SCA to civil discovery.

In order to remedy this problem of judicial overreach, Congress should amend the SCA to include a civil discovery provision. First, this provision should update the anachronistic definition of what is protected information. Second, the amendment should codify a user exception, allowing the discovery of electronic information through the user. Third, the amendment should allow discovery of information stored by Internet service providers like Google and Facebook if the requesting party pays the responding party’s costs. Such a solution would satisfy the interests of justice and efficiency, both of which are goals set out in Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

:: View PDF

De Novo

  • Case Comment: Bhogaita v. Altamonte

    EVERY DOG CAN HAVE HIS DAY IN COURT: THE USE OF ANIMALS AS DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS Kyle R. Kroll, Volume 100, Online Managing Editor In Bhogaita v. Altamonte, the Eleventh Circuit recently decided whether to allow a dog in the courtroom as a demonstrative exhibit.[1] Although the case presented many serious [...]

  • Revisiting Water Bankruptcy

    REVISITING WATER BANKRUPTCY IN CALIFORNIA’S FOURTH YEAR OF DROUGHT Olivia Moe, Volume 100, Managing Editor This spring, as “extreme” to “exceptional” drought stretched across most of California—indicating that a four-year streak of drought was not about to resolve itself[1]—Governor Jerry Brown issued an unprecedented order to reduce potable urban water [...]

  • Defying Auer Deference

    DEFYING AUER DEFERENCE: SKIDMORE AS A SOLUTION TO CONSERVATIVE CONCERNS IN PEREZ v. MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION Nicholas R. Bednar, Volume 100, Lead Articles Editor* On March 9, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association.[1]F The Court overturned the D.C. [...]